<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Text of Section 230</title>
	<atom:link href="http://onlineliabilityblog.com/text-of-section-230/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://onlineliabilityblog.com</link>
	<description>47 USC 230(c)(1) a/k/a Section 230, etc.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2011 00:18:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ninth Circuit: Roommates.com largely unprotected by Section 230 &#171; Online Liability Blog™</title>
		<link>http://onlineliabilityblog.com/text-of-section-230/#comment-668</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ninth Circuit: Roommates.com largely unprotected by Section 230 &#171; Online Liability Blog™]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 01:12:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlineliabilityblog.com/text-of-section-230/#comment-668</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] are of course dealing with a statute here, and the Court appropriately begins by asking what Congress had in mind when it enacted the [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] are of course dealing with a statute here, and the Court appropriately begins by asking what Congress had in mind when it enacted the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 7th Circuit rules in favor of Craigslist &#171; Online Liability Blog™</title>
		<link>http://onlineliabilityblog.com/text-of-section-230/#comment-623</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[7th Circuit rules in favor of Craigslist &#171; Online Liability Blog™]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 13:50:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlineliabilityblog.com/text-of-section-230/#comment-623</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] of Craigslist&#8217;s motion for judgment on the pleadings. In other words, the Court ruled that Section 230 protects Craigslist from the Fair Housing Act claims contained in plaintiff&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of Craigslist&#8217;s motion for judgment on the pleadings. In other words, the Court ruled that Section 230 protects Craigslist from the Fair Housing Act claims contained in plaintiff&#8217;s [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RipOffReport.com wins one in Florida &#171; Online Liability Blog™</title>
		<link>http://onlineliabilityblog.com/text-of-section-230/#comment-607</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[RipOffReport.com wins one in Florida &#171; Online Liability Blog™]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 05:54:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlineliabilityblog.com/text-of-section-230/#comment-607</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] website. The Court concluded that the defendants failed to demonstrate they were entitled to Section 230 protection, and remanded to the district court for a determination of whether personal jurisdiction [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] website. The Court concluded that the defendants failed to demonstrate they were entitled to Section 230 protection, and remanded to the district court for a determination of whether personal jurisdiction [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Developments in Wikileaks.org lawsuit &#171; Online Liability Blog™</title>
		<link>http://onlineliabilityblog.com/text-of-section-230/#comment-592</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Developments in Wikileaks.org lawsuit &#171; Online Liability Blog™]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 22:58:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlineliabilityblog.com/text-of-section-230/#comment-592</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] is described in the article as expressing disappointment with Dynadot&#8217;s actions, noting that Section 230 protects the company from the plaintiffs&#8217; claims. Beyond simply complying with a court order [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is described in the article as expressing disappointment with Dynadot&#8217;s actions, noting that Section 230 protects the company from the plaintiffs&#8217; claims. Beyond simply complying with a court order [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Court: Section 230 is an affirmative defense, thus it&#8217;s (generally) not an appropriate basis for a Motion to Dismiss &#171; Online Liability Blog™</title>
		<link>http://onlineliabilityblog.com/text-of-section-230/#comment-590</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Court: Section 230 is an affirmative defense, thus it&#8217;s (generally) not an appropriate basis for a Motion to Dismiss &#171; Online Liability Blog™]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 20:13:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlineliabilityblog.com/text-of-section-230/#comment-590</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] to dismiss filed in the case, Curran v. Amazon.com, et al. CafePress asserted in its motion that Section 230 grants it federal immunity from tort liability and preempts both counts of the complaint. In [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to dismiss filed in the case, Curran v. Amazon.com, et al. CafePress asserted in its motion that Section 230 grants it federal immunity from tort liability and preempts both counts of the complaint. In [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seventh Circuit considers whether Section 230 protects Craigslist from Fair Housing Act claims &#171; Online Liability Blog™</title>
		<link>http://onlineliabilityblog.com/text-of-section-230/#comment-576</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Seventh Circuit considers whether Section 230 protects Craigslist from Fair Housing Act claims &#171; Online Liability Blog™]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 00:00:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlineliabilityblog.com/text-of-section-230/#comment-576</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Inc. (“Craigslist”). CLC, as you may recall, is appealing Judge St. Eve’s rulings that Section 230 protects Craigslist from liability for housing ads placed on the site by third parties that [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Inc. (“Craigslist”). CLC, as you may recall, is appealing Judge St. Eve’s rulings that Section 230 protects Craigslist from liability for housing ads placed on the site by third parties that [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guest Post: Sloan v. Truong, et al (S.D.N.Y.) &#171; Online Liability Blog™</title>
		<link>http://onlineliabilityblog.com/text-of-section-230/#comment-232</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guest Post: Sloan v. Truong, et al (S.D.N.Y.) &#171; Online Liability Blog™]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 20:26:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlineliabilityblog.com/text-of-section-230/#comment-232</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] him to guest post on the recently filed Sloan v. Truong, et al case, which raises at least one Section 230 issue. Of course one read of the complaint will tell you that this case is about much more than [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] him to guest post on the recently filed Sloan v. Truong, et al case, which raises at least one Section 230 issue. Of course one read of the complaint will tell you that this case is about much more than [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Third Circuit affirms Section 230 dismissal of libel suit against website &#171; Online Liability Blog™</title>
		<link>http://onlineliabilityblog.com/text-of-section-230/#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Third Circuit affirms Section 230 dismissal of libel suit against website &#171; Online Liability Blog™]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 22:42:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlineliabilityblog.com/text-of-section-230/#comment-27</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] 230 dismissal of libel suit against&#160;website  Earlier this week the Third Circuit, citing Section 230, affirmed a lower court’s dismissal of a complaint that alleged the defendant had “published” [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 230 dismissal of libel suit against&nbsp;website  Earlier this week the Third Circuit, citing Section 230, affirmed a lower court’s dismissal of a complaint that alleged the defendant had “published” [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

