<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Online Liability Blog™</title>
	<atom:link href="http://onlineliabilityblog.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://onlineliabilityblog.com</link>
	<description>Laws and litigation that regulate, challenge and immunize Internet websites and other online services</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 10:08:35 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on 7th Circuit rules in favor of Craigslist by Vince</title>
		<link>http://onlineliabilityblog.com/2008/03/14/7th-circuit-rules-in-favor-of-craigslist/#comment-701</link>
		<dc:creator>Vince</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 12:36:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlineliabilityblog.wordpress.com/?p=142#comment-701</guid>
		<description>Hi%2C+good+morning+to+all+of+you...+Nice+Guestbook+%3B%2D%29+%21%21%21+</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi%2C+good+morning+to+all+of+you&#8230;+Nice+Guestbook+%3B%2D%29+%21%21%21+</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Fifth Circuit issues its first Section 230 opinion by Michael Erdman</title>
		<link>http://onlineliabilityblog.com/2008/06/24/fifth-circuit-issues-its-first-section-230-opinion/#comment-697</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Erdman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 03:26:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlineliabilityblog.wordpress.com/?p=150#comment-697</guid>
		<description>Thanks Evan.  I'd nearly forgotten my password it had been so long.  How lame is that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Evan.  I&#8217;d nearly forgotten my password it had been so long.  How lame is that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Fifth Circuit issues its first Section 230 opinion by Evan</title>
		<link>http://onlineliabilityblog.com/2008/06/24/fifth-circuit-issues-its-first-section-230-opinion/#comment-696</link>
		<dc:creator>Evan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 03:08:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlineliabilityblog.wordpress.com/?p=150#comment-696</guid>
		<description>Glad to see you're back posting!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad to see you&#8217;re back posting!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Xcentric sued in Nebraska for alleged defamation, RICO violations, etc. by Randal South</title>
		<link>http://onlineliabilityblog.com/2007/10/19/xcentric-sued-in-nebraska-for-alleged-defamation-rico-violations-etc/#comment-694</link>
		<dc:creator>Randal South</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 23:16:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlineliabilityblog.com/2007/10/19/xcentric-sued-in-nebraska-for-alleged-defamation-rico-violations-etc/#comment-694</guid>
		<description>I am a complainant who has filed reports on the ripoffreport.com and I can assure the filers of this lawsuit that Mr. Magedson did not author my content.  I take it the filers of this lawsuit are against consumer protection.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a complainant who has filed reports on the ripoffreport.com and I can assure the filers of this lawsuit that Mr. Magedson did not author my content.  I take it the filers of this lawsuit are against consumer protection.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Batzel v. Smith by Ninth Circuit: Roommates.com largely unprotected by Section 230 &#171; Online Liability Blog™</title>
		<link>http://onlineliabilityblog.com/batzel-v-smith/#comment-670</link>
		<dc:creator>Ninth Circuit: Roommates.com largely unprotected by Section 230 &#171; Online Liability Blog™</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 01:50:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlineliabilityblog.com/batzel-v-smith/#comment-670</guid>
		<description>[...] I&#8217;m still digesting this thing (and may alter some of this post upon further reflection), but will say that I definitely anticipate a certiorari petition in the not too distant future. In the meantime, I recommend you give it a read. Check out the favorable language directed at search engines and sites that, like Roommate.com and the one in Carafano, classify user data. Also look for several generic examples offered by the Court of situations where immunity would and would not apply, and &#8220;clarifications&#8221; of two prior Ninth Circuit rulings (Carafano and Batzel). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I&#8217;m still digesting this thing (and may alter some of this post upon further reflection), but will say that I definitely anticipate a certiorari petition in the not too distant future. In the meantime, I recommend you give it a read. Check out the favorable language directed at search engines and sites that, like Roommate.com and the one in Carafano, classify user data. Also look for several generic examples offered by the Court of situations where immunity would and would not apply, and &#8220;clarifications&#8221; of two prior Ninth Circuit rulings (Carafano and Batzel). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Carafano v. Metrosplash.com, Inc. by Ninth Circuit: Roommates.com largely unprotected by Section 230 &#171; Online Liability Blog™</title>
		<link>http://onlineliabilityblog.com/carafano-v-metrosplashcom-inc/#comment-669</link>
		<dc:creator>Ninth Circuit: Roommates.com largely unprotected by Section 230 &#171; Online Liability Blog™</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 01:26:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlineliabilityblog.com/carafano-v-metrosplashcom-inc/#comment-669</guid>
		<description>[...] the favorable language directed at search engines and sites that, like Roommate.com and the one in Carafano, classify user data. Also look for several generic examples offered by the Court of situations [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the favorable language directed at search engines and sites that, like Roommate.com and the one in Carafano, classify user data. Also look for several generic examples offered by the Court of situations [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Text of Section 230 by Ninth Circuit: Roommates.com largely unprotected by Section 230 &#171; Online Liability Blog™</title>
		<link>http://onlineliabilityblog.com/text-of-section-230/#comment-668</link>
		<dc:creator>Ninth Circuit: Roommates.com largely unprotected by Section 230 &#171; Online Liability Blog™</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 01:12:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlineliabilityblog.com/text-of-section-230/#comment-668</guid>
		<description>[...] are of course dealing with a statute here, and the Court appropriately begins by asking what Congress had in mind when it enacted the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] are of course dealing with a statute here, and the Court appropriately begins by asking what Congress had in mind when it enacted the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ninth Circuit: Roommates.com largely unprotected by Section 230 by Lex Ferenda &#187; Got a room?</title>
		<link>http://onlineliabilityblog.com/2008/04/03/ninth-circuit-roommatescom-largely-unprotected-by-section-230/#comment-667</link>
		<dc:creator>Lex Ferenda &#187; Got a room?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 23:40:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlineliabilityblog.wordpress.com/?p=146#comment-667</guid>
		<description>[...] &#124; Online Liability Blog   &#171; The real reason for the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] | Online Liability Blog   &laquo; The real reason for the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Fair Housing Council of San Fernando Valley v. Roommate.com, LLC by Ninth Circuit: Roommates.com largely unprotected by Section 230 &#171; Online Liability Blog™</title>
		<link>http://onlineliabilityblog.com/fair-housing-council-of-san-fernando-valley-v-roommatecom-llc/#comment-666</link>
		<dc:creator>Ninth Circuit: Roommates.com largely unprotected by Section 230 &#171; Online Liability Blog™</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 22:41:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlineliabilityblog.com/fair-housing-council-of-san-fernando-valley-v-roommatecom-llc/#comment-666</guid>
		<description>[...] the facts of the case and previous rulings. If that&#8217;s not the case, check out my May 2007 summary of the three judge panel&#8217;s decision reversing the District Court&#8217;s application of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the facts of the case and previous rulings. If that&#8217;s not the case, check out my May 2007 summary of the three judge panel&#8217;s decision reversing the District Court&#8217;s application of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Zeran v. America Online, Inc. by Section 230 does not shield website from state IP claims &#171; Online Liability Blog™</title>
		<link>http://onlineliabilityblog.com/zeran-v-america-online-inc/#comment-665</link>
		<dc:creator>Section 230 does not shield website from state IP claims &#171; Online Liability Blog™</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 15:58:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlineliabilityblog.wordpress.com/zeran-v-america-online-inc/#comment-665</guid>
		<description>[...] his analysis by affirming the principle, adopted by most Federal Circuits, that, stemming from Zeran v. America Online, Inc., 129 F.3d 327 (4th Cir. 1997), sections [47 U.S.C.] 230(c)(1), (f)(3), and (e)(3) of the CDA bar [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] his analysis by affirming the principle, adopted by most Federal Circuits, that, stemming from Zeran v. America Online, Inc., 129 F.3d 327 (4th Cir. 1997), sections [47 U.S.C.] 230(c)(1), (f)(3), and (e)(3) of the CDA bar [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>