<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Online Liability Blog™</title>
	<atom:link href="http://onlineliabilityblog.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://onlineliabilityblog.com</link>
	<description>Laws and litigation that regulate, challenge and immunize Internet websites and other online services</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 23:49:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Ninth Circuit: Roommates.com largely unprotected by Section 230 by bill</title>
		<link>http://onlineliabilityblog.com/2008/04/03/ninth-circuit-roommatescom-largely-unprotected-by-section-230/#comment-779</link>
		<dc:creator>bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 23:49:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlineliabilityblog.wordpress.com/?p=146#comment-779</guid>
		<description>is there any update to this post?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>is there any update to this post?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on YouTube wins on personal jurisdiction, venue arguments in Washington state by Victoria S. Bowen</title>
		<link>http://onlineliabilityblog.com/2008/04/22/youtube-wins-on-personal-jurisdiction-venue-arguments-in-washington-state/#comment-773</link>
		<dc:creator>Victoria S. Bowen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 12:48:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlineliabilityblog.wordpress.com/?p=147#comment-773</guid>
		<description>I accidentally ran across this blog on the case I filed by mistake in Washington.  I only paid $300 to file the case and was not willing to hire a lawyer.  I was simply trying to make YT aware of the extent of the bullying I received on YT because I am androgynous and ugly.  I had wished to strike a spark of humanity because of the deeply disturbing comments in emails and death threats received with a satellite picture of where I lived.  It took me three months to realize The Untouchable Psychopath was not going to physically harass me.  I didn&#039;t know.  In the response from Judge Burgess, the problem of having to file DMCA&#039;s infinitely to get copyright laws enforced - I filed over 20 on the same video - was I was merely annoyed of having to follow the procedure in place.  I had nothing better to do with my time than filing DMCA&#039;s over and over and over and over.  YT is a cold, depressing and damaging place for people who thought YT was going to be a place for EVERYONE to express themselves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I accidentally ran across this blog on the case I filed by mistake in Washington.  I only paid $300 to file the case and was not willing to hire a lawyer.  I was simply trying to make YT aware of the extent of the bullying I received on YT because I am androgynous and ugly.  I had wished to strike a spark of humanity because of the deeply disturbing comments in emails and death threats received with a satellite picture of where I lived.  It took me three months to realize The Untouchable Psychopath was not going to physically harass me.  I didn&#8217;t know.  In the response from Judge Burgess, the problem of having to file DMCA&#8217;s infinitely to get copyright laws enforced &#8211; I filed over 20 on the same video &#8211; was I was merely annoyed of having to follow the procedure in place.  I had nothing better to do with my time than filing DMCA&#8217;s over and over and over and over.  YT is a cold, depressing and damaging place for people who thought YT was going to be a place for EVERYONE to express themselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Regulation of Online Intrastate Gambling by megan</title>
		<link>http://onlineliabilityblog.com/2007/10/12/regulation-of-online-intrastate-gambling/#comment-760</link>
		<dc:creator>megan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 13:50:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlineliabilityblog.com/2007/10/12/regulation-of-online-intrastate-gambling/#comment-760</guid>
		<description>we are still hoping that the bill on online gambling be raised up  - http://cyberarts.com/articles_online_gambling_jurisdictions.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>we are still hoping that the bill on online gambling be raised up  &#8211; <a href="http://cyberarts.com/articles_online_gambling_jurisdictions.html" rel="nofollow">http://cyberarts.com/articles_online_gambling_jurisdictions.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Seventh Circuit considers whether Section 230 protects Craigslist from Fair Housing Act claims by Michael Erdman</title>
		<link>http://onlineliabilityblog.com/2008/02/15/seventh-circuit-considers-whether-section-230-protects-craigslist-from-fair-housing-act-claims/#comment-751</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Erdman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 16:34:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlineliabilityblog.wordpress.com/?p=128#comment-751</guid>
		<description>Please see my subsequent post on the 7th Circuit&#039;s ruling.  -Michael</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please see my subsequent post on the 7th Circuit&#8217;s ruling.  -Michael</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Seventh Circuit considers whether Section 230 protects Craigslist from Fair Housing Act claims by phoneverifiedcraigslistaccounts</title>
		<link>http://onlineliabilityblog.com/2008/02/15/seventh-circuit-considers-whether-section-230-protects-craigslist-from-fair-housing-act-claims/#comment-749</link>
		<dc:creator>phoneverifiedcraigslistaccounts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 11:12:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlineliabilityblog.wordpress.com/?p=128#comment-749</guid>
		<description>What was the outcome of this anyway?
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.phoneverifiedaccounts.net&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Craigslist Phone Verified Accounts&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What was the outcome of this anyway?<br />
<a href="http://www.phoneverifiedaccounts.net" rel="nofollow">Craigslist Phone Verified Accounts</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Seventh Circuit considers whether Section 230 protects Craigslist from Fair Housing Act claims by Craigslist Proxy</title>
		<link>http://onlineliabilityblog.com/2008/02/15/seventh-circuit-considers-whether-section-230-protects-craigslist-from-fair-housing-act-claims/#comment-739</link>
		<dc:creator>Craigslist Proxy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 11:41:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlineliabilityblog.wordpress.com/?p=128#comment-739</guid>
		<description>Well, is anyone or any business really safe these days?  Things can get dragged through court no matter what.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, is anyone or any business really safe these days?  Things can get dragged through court no matter what.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Seventh Circuit considers whether Section 230 protects Craigslist from Fair Housing Act claims by Craigslist Proxy</title>
		<link>http://onlineliabilityblog.com/2008/02/15/seventh-circuit-considers-whether-section-230-protects-craigslist-from-fair-housing-act-claims/#comment-724</link>
		<dc:creator>Craigslist Proxy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 11:15:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlineliabilityblog.wordpress.com/?p=128#comment-724</guid>
		<description>Great post, I\&#039;ll keep coming back to check on updates!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post, I\&#8217;ll keep coming back to check on updates!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Fifth Circuit issues its first Section 230 opinion by Michael Erdman</title>
		<link>http://onlineliabilityblog.com/2008/06/24/fifth-circuit-issues-its-first-section-230-opinion/#comment-697</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Erdman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 03:26:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlineliabilityblog.wordpress.com/?p=150#comment-697</guid>
		<description>Thanks Evan.  I&#039;d nearly forgotten my password it had been so long.  How lame is that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Evan.  I&#8217;d nearly forgotten my password it had been so long.  How lame is that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Fifth Circuit issues its first Section 230 opinion by Evan</title>
		<link>http://onlineliabilityblog.com/2008/06/24/fifth-circuit-issues-its-first-section-230-opinion/#comment-696</link>
		<dc:creator>Evan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 03:08:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlineliabilityblog.wordpress.com/?p=150#comment-696</guid>
		<description>Glad to see you&#039;re back posting!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad to see you&#8217;re back posting!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Xcentric sued in Nebraska for alleged defamation, RICO violations, etc. by Randal South</title>
		<link>http://onlineliabilityblog.com/2007/10/19/xcentric-sued-in-nebraska-for-alleged-defamation-rico-violations-etc/#comment-694</link>
		<dc:creator>Randal South</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 23:16:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlineliabilityblog.com/2007/10/19/xcentric-sued-in-nebraska-for-alleged-defamation-rico-violations-etc/#comment-694</guid>
		<description>I am a complainant who has filed reports on the ripoffreport.com and I can assure the filers of this lawsuit that Mr. Magedson did not author my content.  I take it the filers of this lawsuit are against consumer protection.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a complainant who has filed reports on the ripoffreport.com and I can assure the filers of this lawsuit that Mr. Magedson did not author my content.  I take it the filers of this lawsuit are against consumer protection.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>