http://onlineliabilityblog.com 47 USC 230(c)(1) a/k/a Section 230, etc. Thu, 29 Dec 2011 00:18:52 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ http://onlineliabilityblog.com/carafano-v-metrosplashcom-inc/#comment-669 Fri, 04 Apr 2008 01:26:03 +0000 http://onlineliabilityblog.com/carafano-v-metrosplashcom-inc/#comment-669 [...] the favorable language directed at search engines and sites that, like Roommate.com and the one in Carafano, classify user data. Also look for several generic examples offered by the Court of situations [...]

]]> http://onlineliabilityblog.com/carafano-v-metrosplashcom-inc/#comment-103 Thu, 18 Oct 2007 21:03:47 +0000 http://onlineliabilityblog.com/carafano-v-metrosplashcom-inc/#comment-103 [...] opinion was affirmed by the Ninth Circuit, it was done so on other grounds, and contrary to the Ninth Circuit’s opinion, concluded that Section 230 immunity did not apply to the subject website. Why is the F&C [...]

]]> http://onlineliabilityblog.com/carafano-v-metrosplashcom-inc/#comment-72 Fri, 12 Oct 2007 19:35:59 +0000 http://onlineliabilityblog.com/carafano-v-metrosplashcom-inc/#comment-72 [...] (rendering the website a content provider of the questionnaires). Explaining that it did not read Carafano “as granting CDA immunity to those who actively encourage, solicit and profit from the [...]

]]> http://onlineliabilityblog.com/carafano-v-metrosplashcom-inc/#comment-8 Fri, 24 Aug 2007 20:33:17 +0000 http://onlineliabilityblog.com/carafano-v-metrosplashcom-inc/#comment-8 [...] in this case.” Apparently viewing the website’s functionality as more like Matchmaker.com (see Carafano case) than Roommate.com (see Fair Housing Council case), the court added that “the mere fact SexSearch [...]

]]>