http://onlineliabilityblog.com 47 USC 230(c)(1) a/k/a Section 230, etc. Thu, 29 Dec 2011 00:18:52 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ http://onlineliabilityblog.com/batzel-v-smith/#comment-670 Fri, 04 Apr 2008 01:50:16 +0000 http://onlineliabilityblog.com/batzel-v-smith/#comment-670 [...] I’m still digesting this thing (and may alter some of this post upon further reflection), but will say that I definitely anticipate a certiorari petition in the not too distant future. In the meantime, I recommend you give it a read. Check out the favorable language directed at search engines and sites that, like Roommate.com and the one in Carafano, classify user data. Also look for several generic examples offered by the Court of situations where immunity would and would not apply, and “clarifications” of two prior Ninth Circuit rulings (Carafano and Batzel). [...]

]]> http://onlineliabilityblog.com/batzel-v-smith/#comment-104 Thu, 18 Oct 2007 21:09:22 +0000 http://onlineliabilityblog.com/batzel-v-smith/#comment-104 [...] then posted by the website owner on the website? I’m reminded of the Ninth’s Circuit Batzel decision, which was issued well before the Magistrate ruled here. Because in my example the emails [...]

]]>