<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ninth Circuit: Roommates.com largely unprotected by Section 230</title>
	<atom:link href="http://onlineliabilityblog.com/2008/04/03/ninth-circuit-roommatescom-largely-unprotected-by-section-230/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://onlineliabilityblog.com/2008/04/03/ninth-circuit-roommatescom-largely-unprotected-by-section-230/</link>
	<description>Laws and litigation that regulate, challenge and immunize Internet websites and other online services</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 10:01:47 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lex Ferenda &#187; Got a room?</title>
		<link>http://onlineliabilityblog.com/2008/04/03/ninth-circuit-roommatescom-largely-unprotected-by-section-230/#comment-667</link>
		<dc:creator>Lex Ferenda &#187; Got a room?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 23:40:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlineliabilityblog.wordpress.com/?p=146#comment-667</guid>
		<description>[...] &#124; Online Liability Blog   &#171; The real reason for the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] | Online Liability Blog   &laquo; The real reason for the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
