http://onlineliabilityblog.com/2007/09/04/perfect-10-seeks-supreme-court-review-of-section-230-ruling/ 47 USC 230(c)(1) a/k/a Section 230, etc. Thu, 29 Dec 2011 00:18:52 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ http://onlineliabilityblog.com/2007/09/04/perfect-10-seeks-supreme-court-review-of-section-230-ruling/#comment-183 Mon, 19 Nov 2007 22:58:10 +0000 http://onlineliabilityblog.com/2007/09/04/perfect-10-seeks-supreme-court-review-of-section-230-ruling/#comment-183 [...] you missed them, here are links to my prior posts on the petition itself, and the Respondents’ opposition brief, as well as a summary of the Ninth Circuit’s [...]

]]> http://onlineliabilityblog.com/2007/09/04/perfect-10-seeks-supreme-court-review-of-section-230-ruling/#comment-174 Fri, 09 Nov 2007 22:54:54 +0000 http://onlineliabilityblog.com/2007/09/04/perfect-10-seeks-supreme-court-review-of-section-230-ruling/#comment-174 [...] and CWIE file brief opposing Perfect 10’s Supreme Court Petition A few months ago I wrote about the Petition for a Writ of Certiorari filed by Perfect 10, Inc. with the U.S. Supreme Court in [...]

]]> http://onlineliabilityblog.com/2007/09/04/perfect-10-seeks-supreme-court-review-of-section-230-ruling/#comment-54 Tue, 02 Oct 2007 15:46:24 +0000 http://onlineliabilityblog.com/2007/09/04/perfect-10-seeks-supreme-court-review-of-section-230-ruling/#comment-54 [...] O’Toole reports that the U.S. Supreme Court has denied certiorari in Delfino v. Agilent Technologies, a California state court decision broadly construing Section 230 protections. I had no idea the petition was pending, but am not surprised by the Court’s refusal to hear an appeal. His report also updates us on the status of the Perfect 10 petition. [...]

]]>